Abstract

The detection of gravito-inertial forces by the otolith system is essential for our sense of balance and accurate perception. To date, however, how this system encodes the self-motion stimuli that are experienced during everyday activities remains unknown. Here, we addressed this fundamental question directly by recording from single otolith afferents in monkeys during naturalistic translational self-motion and changes in static head orientation. Otolith afferents with higher intrinsic variability transmitted more information overall about translational self-motion than their regular counterparts, owing to stronger nonlinearities that enabled precise spike timing including phase locking. By contrast, more regular afferents better discriminated between different static head orientations relative to gravity. Using computational methods, we further demonstrated that coupled increases in intrinsic variability and sensitivity accounted for the observed functional differences between afferent classes. Together, our results indicate that irregular and regular otolith afferents use different strategies to encode naturalistic self-motion and static head orientation relative to gravity.

Highlights

  • The otolith system provides vital information about linear head acceleration in three dimensions and the head’s orientation relative to gravity

  • We show that heterogeneities in the otolith afferent population give rise to different coding strategies to represent the gravito-inertial forces experienced during dynamic naturalistic translational self-motion and static head orientation relative to gravity

  • Analysis of responses to naturalistic translational self-motion stimuli revealed that irregular afferents displayed stronger nonlinearities, and transmitted more information than their regular counterparts for frequencies above 0.1 Hz, via both changes in firing rate and precise spike timing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The otolith system provides vital information about linear head acceleration in three dimensions (i.e., gravito-inertial forces) and the head’s orientation relative to gravity. During natural everyday activities, the head moves with considerable linear acceleration (frequencies up to 20 Hz and amplitudes up to 8G; see Carriot et al, 2014 for human data and Carriot et al, 2017 for monkey and mouse data), and frequently remains stationary during large periods of time (Carriot et al, 2014; Carriot et al, 2017) This observation raises the fundamental question of how the otolith system provides estimates of both dynamic head motion and static orientation relative to gravity.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call