Abstract

Although it is well established that health care professionals use tacit and codified knowledge to provide front-line care, less is known about how these two forms of knowledge can be combined to support improvement related to patient safety. Patient safety interventions involving the codification of knowledge were co-designed by university and hospital-based staff in two English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to support the governance of medication safety and mortality and morbidity (M&M) meetings. At hospital A, a structured mortality review process was introduced into three clinical specialities from January to December 2010. A qualitative approach of observing M&M meetings (n = 30) and conducting interviews (n = 40) was used to examine the impact on meetings and on front-line clinicians and hospital managers. At hospital B, a medication safety ‘scorecard’ was administered on a general medicine and elderly care ward from September to November 2011. Weekly feedback meetings were observed (n = 18) and interviews with front-line staff conducted (n = 10) to examine how knowledge codification influenced behaviour. Codification was shown to support learning related to patient safety at the micro (front-line service) level by structuring the sharing of tacit knowledge, but the presence of professional and managerial boundaries at the organisational level affected the codification initiatives' implementation. The findings suggest that codifying knowledge to support improvement presents distinct challenges at the group and organisational level; translating knowledge across these levels is contingent on the presence of enabling organisational factors, including the alignment of learning from clinical practice with its governance.

Highlights

  • In many health care systems, use of codified knowledge to improve service quality, increase accountability, and support the governance of health care organisations is growing (Denis and Lehoux, 2013)

  • The aim of this paper is to evaluate the challenges of designing and implementing practicebased codification projects, including how they were influenced by professional interests and managerial priorities, to improve patient safety within two National Health Service (NHS) hospitals located in a large English city

  • Tacit and codified knowledge complemented one another with regard to learning from Mortality and Morbidity (M&M) cases and medication safety, but codification had limited impact on existing professional boundaries associated with tacit knowledge use, rather these boundaries were often reproduced in the codification process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In many health care systems, use of codified knowledge to improve service quality, increase accountability, and support the governance of health care organisations is growing (Denis and Lehoux, 2013). In relation to patient safety in the English NHS, codified systems such as the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) are used to facilitate adverse incident reporting, improve the governance of risk, and investigate serious adverse events (National Patient Safety Agency, 2009). S. Turner et al / Social Science & Medicine 113 (2014) 169e176 develop understanding of how tacit and codified knowledge might be combined to support improvement. Turner et al / Social Science & Medicine 113 (2014) 169e176 develop understanding of how tacit and codified knowledge might be combined to support improvement These initiatives related to, first, codifying aspects of traditionally informal, peer-led Mortality and Morbidity (M&M) meetings to support their governance organisationally and, second, feedback of a medication safety ‘scorecard’ to ward-based staff to facilitate discussion around local codified data on medication safety risks

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.