Abstract

BackgroundAdvances in experimental psychology have highlighted the need to modify underlying automatic cognitive biases, such as attentional biases. The effectiveness of bias modification has been well studied for substance use disorders. With recent advances in technology, it is now possible to work outside the laboratory with Web-based and mobile-based attention bias interventions. Gamification technologies might also help diminish the repetitiveness of the task and increase the intrinsic motivation to train. The inconsistent findings of the impact of gaming on the effectiveness of mobile interventions call for further work to better understand the needs of patients (users) and health care professionals.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to involve patients, together with health care professionals, in the design of a gamified mobile attention bias modification intervention for substance use disorders.MethodsThe participatory design research method adopted is that of a user-oriented design approach in the form of a future workshop. In the first phase of the workshop, participants shared their critique of an attention bias modification intervention. In the second phase of the workshop, participants were asked to brainstorm features. Participants were also shown gamification approaches and asked to consider if gaming elements could enhance the existing app. In the last phase, participants were asked to sketch a new prototype.ResultsThree co-design workshops were conducted with health care professionals, inpatients, and outpatients. There were 20 participants, consisting of 10 health care professionals and 10 patients. When asked to identify the limitations in the existing app, common issues identified were those of the design, visual probe task, and the included images. Outpatients were also concerned with the safety of administration of the intervention. In the brainstorming sessions, health care professionals made recommendations as to how the stimulus, the mechanism of responding, and the presentation of the scores could be enhanced. Inpatient participants recommended the addition of functionalities, such as information on the harms associated with the substance use, and for there to be enhancements in the design, images, and task. Outpatient participants perceived a need to improve the images and presentation of the results and recommended the inclusion of gaming features. There were differences in opinion on the inclusion of gaming features, as only health care professionals endorsed their inclusion. In the last phase of the workshop, participants were tasked with the conceptualization of prototypes, and the commonality in the design was for a gradual shortening of the interval for stimulus/image presentation.ConclusionsThe results from this research will guide the development of an app that meets the specific needs of patients and is still based on a pre-existing validated task paradigm.

Highlights

  • IntroductionCannabis, and stimulants are highly abused worldwide [1]

  • Illicit substances like opioids, cannabis, and stimulants are highly abused worldwide [1]

  • Three co-design workshops were conducted with health care professionals, inpatients, and outpatients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cannabis, and stimulants are highly abused worldwide [1]. Advances in experimental psychology have informed the dual-process theoretical model [6,7], which postulates that existing therapies only address the cognitive control processes, but not the underlying automatic, unconscious processes. Attention bias refers to the preferential allocation of attentional processes toward substance-related cues [8], whereas approach bias refers to the automated tendencies for individuals to seek out and reach for substance-related stimuli [9]. To assess these unconscious biases, tasks like the Stroop task and the Visual Probe task are commonly used [10]. The inconsistent findings of the impact of gaming on the effectiveness of mobile interventions call for further work to better understand the needs of patients (users) and health care professionals

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call