Abstract
Sustainable development has to be based on scientific knowledge, social agreements, and political decisions. This study aimed to analyse the implementation of the ecosystem services approach (ESA) in the spatial planning of the Basque Country, via the co-creation of knowledge. This paper uses a proposal for a regional green infrastructure (GI) to examine the co-creation of knowledge process. It addresses the community of practice; a process of co-creation of knowledge through workshops and meeting, SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis using an online survey, and mapping and identification of the multifunctional areas that provide ecosystem services (ES) to develop a GI. Results indicate that ESA has been included in spatial planning actions at different scales (biosphere reserve, metropolitan area, and region). This subsequently created an avenue for understanding the political necessities at play, so that scientists can develop useful tools for sustainable development. The findings also draw attention to the importance of establishing a constructive and mutually comprehensible dialogue between politicians, technical experts and scientists. For ES to be part of spatial planning, ESA has to be taken into account at the beginning of the planning process. We conclude that building bridges between science and spatial planning can help establish science-based management guidelines and tools that help enhance the sustainability of the territory.
Highlights
The social and environmental problems that characterise the global change in the new Anthropocene era pose major challenges for the research community, decision-makers, and civil society organisations in general [1]
ecosystem services approach (ESA) has four common characteristics: (1) a focus on the impacts that an ecosystem’s health and status has on human well-being; (2) an awareness that ecosystem functioning underpins service provision; (3) a holistic approach which addresses the linked components of ecosystems at different scales and requires interdisciplinary collaboration from experts, stakeholders, and the public; and (4) ecosystem services (ES) are incorporated into policy and management decision making to better represent the benefits provided to humans by the natural world
The software used for geoprocessing was ArcMap 10.3 [32] and the land use categories emplTohyeedsofttowaasreseusssedthfeorEgSeowpreorceestshionsgewfaesatAurrceMd aopn10t.h3e[3E2]UaNnIdSthmealapndofustehecaEteugroorpieesaenmNplaotyuerde tIonfaosrsmesastitohne SEySswteemre, atht oassecfaelaetuorfe1d:1o0n,0t0h0e[E2U4]N
Summary
The social and environmental problems that characterise the global change in the new Anthropocene era pose major challenges for the research community, decision-makers, and civil society organisations in general [1]. In the case of land ecosystems, changes in land use constitute an important driving force that acts simultaneously with climate change to impact biodiversity and ecosystem processes [2] This is why it is increasingly important to apply sustainable landscape management practices, in highly anthropised areas. ESA has four common characteristics: (1) a focus on the impacts that an ecosystem’s health and status has on human well-being; (2) an awareness that ecosystem functioning underpins service provision; (3) a holistic approach which addresses the linked components of ecosystems at different scales and requires interdisciplinary collaboration from experts, stakeholders, and the public; and (4) ES are incorporated into policy and management decision making to better represent the benefits provided to humans by the natural world
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
