Abstract

People who either use an upper limb prosthesis and/or have used services provided by a prosthetic rehabilitation centre, experience limitations of currently available prosthetic devices. Collaboration between academia and a broad range of stakeholders, can lead to the development of solutions that address peoples' needs. By doing so, the rate of prosthetic device abandonment can decrease. Co-creation is an approach that can enable collaboration of this nature to occur throughout the research process. We present findings of a co-creation project that gained user perspectives from a user survey, and a subsequent workshop involving: people who use an upper limb prosthesis and/or have experienced care services (users), academics, industry experts, charity executives, and clinicians. The survey invited users to prioritise six themes, which academia, clinicians, and industry should focus on over the next decade. The prioritisation of the themes concluded in the following order, with the first as the most important: function, psychology, aesthetics, clinical service, collaboration, and media. Within five multi-stakeholder groups, the workshop participants discussed challenges and collaborative opportunities for each theme. Workshop groups prioritised the themes based on their discussions, to highlight opportunities for further development. Two groups chose function, one group chose clinical service, one group chose collaboration, and another group chose media. The identified opportunities are presented within the context of the prioritised themes, including the importance of transparent information flow between all stakeholders; user involvement throughout research studies; and routes to informing healthcare policy through collaboration. As the field of upper limb prosthetics moves toward in-home research, we present co-creation as an approach that can facilitate user involvement throughout the duration of such studies.

Highlights

  • The aim of the paper is to highlight development areas for academia, healthcare sector, and industry to explore from a usercentred perspective

  • The order of importance sourced from the survey results is presented in Figure 2: function, psychology, aesthetics, clinical service, collaboration, and media

  • This paper presents findings from a user survey and a co-creation workshop that involved users, academics, clinicians, industry experts, and charity executives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of the paper is to highlight development areas for academia, healthcare sector, and industry to explore from a usercentred perspective. With the term users, we refer to people who either use an upper limb prosthesis and/or have used services provided by a prosthetic rehabilitation centre. People who use an upper limb prosthesis experience a range of challenges, such as functional limitations, and psychological support provision. Advanced prosthetic solutions, developed within academia, aim to meet the needs of prosthesis users (Nazarpour, 2020a). Currently available prostheses fall short in addressing user needs, for example: function and sensory feedback, leading to device abandonment rates of up to 44% (Postema et al, 1999, 2016; Davidson, 2002; Biddiss and Chau, 2007a,b; Østlie et al, 2012; Sugawara et al, 2018; Salminger et al, 2020). For body powered and electronic devices, the abandonment rates of 26 and 23% have been reported (Biddiss and Chau, 2007b)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call