Abstract

To a predominantly conservative literature on community development and local government, The Local State brought a radical and provocative interpretation of the intersection of these domains. With several contemporaneous texts, its analysis helped pioneer a distinct and lasting critical tradition in community development. However, the attention it drew to local government has been stubbornly resisted. This aversion in community development is peculiar and unfortunate and should be redressed. Three years after The Local State appeared I joined an advisory committee for a community building project on a new housing estate. The aim of the project was to model participatory processes for the settlement and integration of residents. The programme focussed on integrative self-help/mutual support type activity with families, particularly mothers (e.g. activity and play groups). Neither the workers concerned, nor the government sponsor, saw local political engagement of the new residents as integral to the task. They had slight interest in local political organization or action. The make-up and policy of municipal government were considered extraneous matters.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.