Coated Polypropylene Mesh Is Associated With Increased Infection in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Abstract

Barrier-coated meshes were designed to reduce adhesion formation between mesh and the surrounding viscera. There have been questions raised but little data to determine if rapidly absorbable coatings pose an increased risk of infection. The objective of this study was to determine if a difference exists in wound and mesh infection rates between coated and uncoated polypropylene mesh in patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair. A prospective, institutional database at a tertiary hernia center identified patients undergoing open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (OPPVHR) with polypropylene mesh in CDC class 1 and 2 wounds. Using propensity score matching, an absorbable, coated and uncoated group were matched based on age, comorbidities, wound class, defect size, and mesh size. There were 265 patients each in the matched coated and uncoated mesh groups for a total of 530 patients. Postoperative wound infections (10.9% versus 4.6%, P=0.01) and need for IV antibiotics (10.5% versus 4.3%, P=0.01) were significantly higher in the coated group. There was an increase in mesh infection for the coated group (3.4% versus 0.4%, P=0.02), and of those developing a mesh infection, 60.0% eventually required mesh excision. Coated mesh was associated with increased postoperative wound and mesh infection following OPPVHR. An uncoated mesh should be strongly considered when placed in an extraperitoneal location.