Abstract
A metrological field intercomparison of thermometer radiation shields in the Arctic was conducted with the aim of obtaining information to increase the worldwide comparability of air temperature measurements. Air temperature measurements are performed by different combinations of thermometers and shields. The response of each system (thermometer + shield) to local meteorological conditions depends on the system itself, limiting the comparability of air temperature measurements. Ten different models of radiation shields were included in the intercomparison, involving two campaigns: (1) the laboratory campaign, where all the instrumentation was calibrated just before and just after the field campaign, and (2) the field campaign that lasted 14 months where 41 thermometers were sampled every 2 min. All the delivered data were subjected to quality control to assure the robustness of the conclusions. A reference shield was defined, and the other shields were compared to the reference one for the conditions where maximum divergences were expected, solar irradiance being the highest impact factor. A maximum divergence value of 1.29 °C was derived for one of the shields and, for all the shields, the difference from the reference one decreases with wind speed. Finally, the uncertainties associated with the shields intercomparison were calculated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.