Abstract
Coastal barriers are defined as shore-parallel, aggraded-prograded supratidal beach ridge sets and individual single ridge-landforms, composed of sand and/or gravel. Island, spit, and mainland barriers represent the three major topographic subdivisions. In terms of bathymetric and hydrographic characteristics, bottom sediment types and associated habitats, barriers separate the marine offshore from inshore facies. This definition is not uniformly accepted and applied in the literature. Barriers impose reduced salinities inshore, diminish storm impact and moderate inland inundation, protect critical habitats and may mark ancient longshore transport directions, shore and sea-level positions. A wide range of dimensions, topography, and other factors characterize mainland strandplains. Shoal aggradation appears to be the prime island-forming mechanism, followed by accretion around semi-consolidated, elevated cores. Smaller islands may also form by barrier spit fragmentation. Detachment of dune ridges from the mainland shore is an often cited but at best unlikely mode of island genesis. Review of the literature and remote-sensed images created new insights, utilized barrier definitions and genetic theories, as applied in the Mississippi Delta Complex. A three-stage concept, involving dune ridge or barrier spit-detachment by marine encroachment and landward shift of fragmented transgressive islands forms the basis of a recent invited Marine Geology research article. That model assumes spit-growth from delta headlands, followed by splintering into landward-migrating islands. Submerged, they become permanent shoals. For several reasons, this “island-cycle” hypothesis is questionable and a reassessment of the geomorphic and stratigraphic context of this delta coast is required.Contradicting the geomorphic setting of assumed Stage 1, key component of the cycle-model, evidence is lacking for subrecent delta lobes and erosional headland in spawning barrier islands. In addition, the delta headland-flanking islands reveal only progradational (regressive) development and in situ disintegration,. Transgressive landward migrations is known only from the Chandeleur chain's prehistory. Sand from decaying Terrebonne-Lafourche 6 Subdelta headland was the dominant source for the Caminada Strandplain and for the shoal /or island predecessor of Grand Isle. Wave refraction around an inferred Lafourche delta lobe (dated provisionally between ∼2900 - ∼ 2300 yrs. BP) and its decayed erosional headland remnant resulted in diametric reversal of littoral sand transport. An earlier proferred ∼750–300 yrs. BP Caminada Strandplain age range is now replaced by a loosely defined ∼2200- to- ∼800 yrs. BP value, based on ages of Grand Isle and reworked delta hinterland sediments incorporated into the Strandplain.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.