Abstract
We previously demonstrated, on the basis of detailed morphological and morphometric investigations of a lifetime inhalation study of F344 rats exposed to three sizes of chrysotile fibre, that a short, amphibole-free chrysotile from Coalinga, California failed to induce pathological effects whilst the other two, both long fibres from Canada, were both fibrogenic and tumourigenic. Here, we demonstrate that, as one would predict from their size differences, the Coalinga fibre was almost totally cleared whilst the Canadian fibres were largely retained 1 year post exposure. We therefore propose on the basis of these observations that the observed absence of biological effects noted with Coalinga is potentially attributable to its lack of biopersistence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.