COALESCENCE VERSUS COMPETITION: FIELD AND LABORATORY STUDIES OF INTRA‐ AND INTERSPECIFIC ENCOUNTERS AMONG COALESCING SEAWEEDS

Abstract

Classical ecological theory predicts that whenever growing individuals share a common and limiting resource, such as substratum in mid‐intertidal and shallow subtidal habitats, preemptive competition will occur determining species abundance and distribution patterns. However, conspecificity of several ecologically dominant Rhodophyta may coalesce when grown in laboratory cultures. The extent at which intraspecific coalescence occurs in the field and whether the process may also happens during interspecific encounters remain to be determined. If intra‐ and interspecific coalescence effectively occurs, then coexistence through coalescence rises as an alternative to competition among red‐algal dominated intertidal and shallow subtidal communities. Populations of Mazzaella laminarioides and Nothogenia fastigiata living in mid‐intertidal, semi‐exposed rocky habitats in Central Chile are being used to test the above ideas. Intra‐ and interspecific encounters occur in the field throughout the year. Coalescence does occur among conspecific partners but it has not been detected in interspecific encounters. Rather, a thick interface of compressed cells, necrotic tissues and cyanobacterial nodules is formed between the two contacting partners. In addition, observations of laboratory cultures indicate that spore germination, germling survival and differentiation of erect axes in bispecific cultures may be reduced when compared to single‐species controls. Interspecific differences in growth and differentiation rates appear as the mechanisms explaining a lack of coalescence and negative effects during interspecific contacts. On the other hand, the existence of conspecific coalescence in the field suggests this process should be considered as a real alternative to intraspecific competition among coalescing Rhodophyta.