CO2 Injectivity Test Proves Concept of CCUS Field Development

Abstract

_ This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 216673, “CO2 Injectivity Test Proves the Concept of CCUS Field Development,” by Yermek Kaipov, SPE, and Bertrand Theuveny, SLB, and Ajay Maurya, Saudi Aramco, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed. _ The complete paper presents a unique case study on injectivity tests done in Saudi Arabia to prove the concept of carbon capture, use, and storage (CCUS) capability. It describes the design of surface and downhole testing systems, lessons learned, and recommendations. The injectivity tests were effective in identifying and confirming the best reservoir for CO2 injection and defining the best completion strategy. Creating injection conditions close to CCUS is vital, especially in heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs where the petrophysical correlations for the reservoir model require calibration with dynamic data. Introduction The energy company has conducted an extensive evaluation campaign by drilling appraisal wells through multizone saline aquifer reservoirs on different sites close to potential sources of CO2 at the surface. The evaluation program included coring, openhole logging, formation testing for stress-test and water sampling, and injectivity testing in the cased hole. Apart from reservoir characterization, different completion strategies were evaluated by performing injectivity tests in both vertical and horizontal wells. The lower completion was represented by perforated casing and an open hole. Injectivity Testing Injection tests are a commonly used method in waterflood projects to evaluate the injectivity capacity of the well and reservoir. The test involves an injection period with one or more injection rates, followed by a falloff period (Fig. 1). During the injection period, the liquid is injected at a stable rate to reduce the risk of near-wellbore formation damage caused by fluid incompatibility or exceeding the fracture gradient and inducing formation fracturing. The bottomhole-pressure data acquired during the test is analyzed using the pressure transient analysis method to estimate the permeability thickness, skin factor, and lateral heterogeneities. Additionally, the injection logging profile can be conducted along the sandface to assess completion efficiency and formation heterogeneity. By interpreting the results of the injection test, engineers can optimize the injection rate and improve the performance of the well and reservoir, ultimately leading to more-efficient oil recovery. Injectivity Test: Case Study The injectivity tests were conducted on virgin reservoirs using vertical appraisal wells that were sidetracked horizontally into the reservoirs with the greatest potential for storage. The reservoirs’ depths varied from 4,000 to 8,000 ft, with a normal gradient of reservoir pressure and temperature. The injectivity test design used reservoir properties estimated from the openhole evaluation, such as porosity, permeability, reservoir pressure, temperature, reservoir fluid sample, and fracture gradient. These data were used to set injectivity-test objectives, calculate expected well parameters, select equipment, and plan operations. The primary goal of the tests was to assess reservoir injectivity by injecting water, nitrogen, and CO2 to prove the concept for a CO2-injection project. While water and nitrogen injections are well-known in the industry, the CO2 injectivity test was new and required more attention during the design phase to evaluate all possible risks.