Abstract
AbstractWe examine the electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) of three Ir( )2(acac) complexes, where acac=acetylacetonate anion and =2‐phenylpyridine (ppy), 2‐phenylbenzothiazole (bt), or 2‐phenylquinoline (pq) anions, with tri‐n‐propylamine co‐reactant in acetonitrile under a range of chemical and instrumental conditions; this follows somewhat conflicting recent claims of the ECL intensities from complexes of this type. Relevant electrochemical, spectroscopic, and ECL properties are evaluated in direct comparison with those of Ir(ppy)3 and [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)2, as well as data from previous publications. DFT calculations on the Ir( )2(acac) complexes show the HOMOs to be composed of both the metal and the ligand, and the LUMOs almost exclusively on the ligand. The ECL intensities of the Ir( )2(acac) complexes (relative to [Ru(bpy)3](PF6)2) were dependent on experimental conditions and, in some cases, the ECL intensities reported for iridium complexes may have been derived using conditions that unintentionally disadvantaged the reference electrochemiluminophore.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.