Abstract

The recognition that chronic care delivery is suboptimal has led many health authorities around the world to redesign it. In Norway, the Department of Health and Care Services implemented the Coordination Reform in January 2012. One policy instrument was to build emergency bed capacity (EBC) as an integrated part of primary care service provided by municipalities. The explicit aim was to reduce the rate of avoidable admissions to state-owned hospitals. Using five different sources of register data and a quasi-experimental framework—the “difference-in-differences” regression approach—we estimated the association between changes in EBC on changes in aggregate emergency hospital admissions for eight ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). The results show that EBC is negatively associated with changes in aggregate ACSC emergency admissions. The associations are largely consistent with alternative model specifications. We also estimated the relationship between changes in EBC on changes in each ACSC condition separately. Our results are mixed. EBC is negatively associated with emergency hospital admissions for asthma, angina and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease but not congestive heart failure and diabetes. The main implication of the study is that EBC within primary care is potentially a sensible way of redesigning chronic care.

Highlights

  • The recognition that chronic care delivery is suboptimal has led many health authorities the world over to redesign chronic care

  • Chronic care delivery is suboptimal in many countries, and policymakers around the world pursue a reduction in avoidable hospital admissions by redesigning health care delivery

  • One of the tools of the reform was the introduction of emergency bed capacity (EBC) within primary care services with the aim of reducing emergency admissions to state-owned hospitals run by regional health enterprises

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The recognition that chronic care delivery is suboptimal has led many health authorities the world over to redesign chronic care. We used a differencein-differences (DID) regression approach to study the association between EBC in primary care and emergency hospital admissions for eight ACSC chronic conditions: asthma, angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes (uncomplicated), congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, epilepsy and ulcers. Using a quasi-experimental framework (the DID approach) we observed ACSC emergency admissions at hospitals for the two groups over two periods and estimated the association between changes in EBC in primary care and ACSC-related hospital admissions. It appears that 73 municipalities (i.e. the intervention group) took advantage of the subsidies by 31 December 2012. As presented in the introduction, studies of hospitalization rates for ACSC (e.g., [7, 8, 10, 11, 15]) show that there is an inverse relation between socio-economic status and emergency admissions for ACSC

Results
Conclusions
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call