Abstract

Male youth in lower-resource neighborhoods bear a disproportionate burden of violence involvement, but little is known about clusters of specific violence-related behaviors to inform cross-cutting interventions that address multiple forms of violence. To examine associations between adult support and patterns of violence and risk or protective behavior co-occurrence among male youths in urban neighborhoods. Cross-sectional analysis of baseline and end-of-program data from a recently completed cluster-randomized sexual violence prevention trial across 20 lower-resource neighborhoods. Participants were male youths, aged 13 to 19 years, enrolled at youth-serving community agencies in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, from July 27, 2015, to June 5, 2017. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019. Social support and natural mentoring, as defined by validated survey measures. Validated survey measures (youth violence, bullying, sexual and dating violence, history of exposure to violence and related adversities, substance use, school engagement, and future orientation) were assessed for detailed co-occurrence patterns using hierarchical clustering, dendrograms, and heatmaps across prespecified domains. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and logistic regression models examined associations between adult support and violence involvement. Among 866 participants, the mean (SD) age was 15.5 (1.6) years and 632 participants (77.5%) identified as African American. All 866 participants completed baseline surveys and 577 completed end-of-program surveys. Seven clusters of risk and protective behaviors emerged: (1) school engagement; (2) career and future aspirations; (3) substance use and bullying exposure; (4) exposure to violence and related adversities, sexual violence exposure, peer delinquency, and gang involvement; (5) sexual violence, youth violence, and bullying perpetration; (6) dating abuse perpetration; and (7) physical or sexual partner violence perpetration. The strongest association cluster occurred among sexual violence perpetration behaviors. Youth with high social support engaged in significantly fewer of the 40 prespecified risk behaviors (high social support median [interquartile range], 8 [5-12] behaviors vs low social support median [interquartile range], 10 [6-14] behaviors; mean difference, 1.64 behaviors; 95% CI, 0.63-2.64 behaviors; P = .004). High social support and natural mentoring were both inversely associated with gang involvement (social support: odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.71; and natural mentoring: OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.76) and sexual violence exposure (social support: OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.64; and natural mentoring: OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.98). These findings suggest that co-occurrence of risk and protective behaviors differ significantly among youth with vs without adult support. Violence prevention interventions designed to leverage adult support should address broader co-occurrence patterns.

Highlights

  • Violence is pervasive and leads to significant morbidity and mortality.1 Male youth in urban neighborhoods bear a disproportionate burden of individual and community violence exposure, which has been linked to increased risk of violence perpetration.2-10 Historically, violence research has tended to focus narrowly on single types of violence and associated risk and protective factors

  • High social support and natural mentoring were both inversely associated with gang involvement and sexual violence exposure

  • Violence-Related Risk and Protective Behaviors and Adult Support Among Urban Male Youth. These findings suggest that co-occurrence of risk and protective behaviors differ significantly among youth with vs without adult support

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Violence is pervasive and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Male youth in urban neighborhoods bear a disproportionate burden of individual and community violence exposure, which has been linked to increased risk of violence perpetration. Historically, violence research has tended to focus narrowly on single types of violence (eg, youth violence perpetration) and associated risk and protective factors. Violence research has tended to focus narrowly on single types of violence (eg, youth violence perpetration) and associated risk and protective factors. Understanding nuanced patterns across types of violence perpetration and associated exposures, and how these patterns align with multiple risk and protective factors among male youth in urban neighborhoods, can identify targets for intervention. Social support and adolescent-adult connections with family and natural mentors have been identified as protective factors in dating violence and bullying perpetration.. Research among male youth in lower-resource urban neighborhoods has tended to focus on youth violence perpetration and community violence exposure, with mixed findings related to protective effects of adolescent-adult connections.. Associations between adolescent-adult connections and other forms of violence perpetration (eg, sexual violence, bullying) are not as well characterized among youth in lower-resource urban neighborhoods.. Adolescent-adult connections with family and natural mentors have shown promise in protecting youth from violence perpetration and in buffering the negative effects of violence exposure on school performance, substance use, and mental health outcomes. In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention proposed promising strategies for youth violence prevention: strengthening social support and fostering adolescent-adult connections. Social support and adolescent-adult connections with family and natural mentors have been identified as protective factors in dating violence and bullying perpetration. Research among male youth in lower-resource urban neighborhoods has tended to focus on youth violence perpetration and community violence exposure, with mixed findings related to protective effects of adolescent-adult connections. Associations between adolescent-adult connections and other forms of violence perpetration (eg, sexual violence, bullying) are not as well characterized among youth in lower-resource urban neighborhoods. Given high rates of both violence exposure and violence perpetration in these contexts, better understanding of adolescent-adult connections and violence co-occurrence is warranted

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call