Abstract

The current assessment in language classrooms prevailingly utilizes the criteria provided by instructors, regarding learners as passive recipients of assessment. The current study drew upon sustainable assessment and the community of practice to highlight the importance of involving learners in co-constructing the assessment criteria and argued that using the criteria provided by instructors could lead to discrepancy between assessment, teaching, and learning. It adopted a participatory approach and investigated how to involve learners in co-constructing the assessment criteria with instructors in tertiary English writing instruction in China, based on the European Language Profile (ELP), an evolved version of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Two writing instructors and 146 tertiary students played different, yet interactive roles in adapting the assessment criteria in the local context. Instructors drafted the criteria in line with curricula, teaching, learning and learners. Learners utilized the draft criteria in a training session and suggested possible modifications to the criteria in a survey. Suggestions were used to revise the descriptors alongside teachers’ reflections via reflective logs. A follow-up survey explored students’ perceptions of the feasibility and usefulness of the modified descriptors to investigate the effectiveness of co-constructing the assessment criteria for learning and reveal further improvement if necessary. Vigilant decision-making processes were thickly described regarding how assessment descriptors were selected, arranged, and modified to constructively align them with curricula, teaching, and learning. Statistical and thematic analyses were conducted to examine the accessibility, feasibility, and usefulness of the assessment descriptors prior to and after the modifications. Results substantiated the effectiveness and thus the importance of co-constructing assessment criteria for enhancing the quality of assessment criteria and developing learners’ cognitive and metacognitive knowledge of writing and assessment. Implications for language tutors regarding co-constructing assessment criteria in local contexts were deliberated on at the end of the article.

Highlights

  • The current study explored how co-constructing assessment criteria could be employed to adapt the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in tertiary EFL (English as a foreign language) writing instruction in China

  • It is important to consider how the CEFR/European Language Profile (ELP), which was designed as a common assessment framework across contexts, can be translated into context-relevant forms (Byrnes, 2007) because their application requires a shift in pedagogic routines to bring curricula, pedagogy, learning and assessment into productive interaction with one another (Little, 2007)

  • This study has provided important implications for how to coconstruct the assessment criteria while adapting the CEFR/ELP and other similar frameworks which were designed as a common framework across contexts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current study explored how co-constructing assessment criteria could be employed to adapt the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in tertiary EFL (English as a foreign language) writing instruction in China. From the empirical perspective, using the assessment criteria offered by instructors leads to discrepant understanding of the criteria by instructors and students (Andrade & Du, 2007) and subsequent misalignment between teaching and learning These pitfalls suggest the necessity of searching for ways of facilitating learners participating in the process of co-constructing assessment criteria alongside their instructors in local settings. The participative approach aimed to adapt the ELP from students’ and instructors’ perspectives and reshape the prevailing teacher-driven assessment to develop learner autonomy and their assessment literacy The results in this exploratory study are expected to provide implications for language educators regarding how to co-construct assessment criteria with students within local contexts so that the CEFR/ELP or similar common assessment frames could be effectively implemented locally

Theoretical and empirical support for co-constructing assessment criteria
Theoretical support for co-constructing assessment criteria
Empirical support for co-constructing assessment criteria
Co-constructing assessment criteria through constructive alignment
Design of the pre-modified assessment criteria
Choosing the relevant ELP descriptors
Constructing the pre-modified criteria: macro- and micro-aspects
Selecting the language proficiency levels of the descriptors
Using emoticons to suggest achievement levels
Training in self-assessment
Questions to guide the co-construction process
Students’ and instructors’ background
Eliciting students’ perceptions of pre-modified ELP descriptors
Eliciting students’ perceptions of the co-constructed modified descriptors
Eliciting instructors’ perceptions of assessment criteria via reflective logs
Students’ perceived accessibility of pre-modified ELP descriptors
Instructors’ perceived accessibility of pre-modified ELP descriptors
Applying students’ and instructors’ suggestions to modify ELP descriptors
Perceived feasibility of modified co-constructed assessment descriptors
Perceived usefulness of modified ELP descriptors for self-assessment
Discussions and implications
Ongoing yet varied formats of interaction in the co-construction process
Evolving pedagogical knowledge and routine to facilitate co-constructing
Conclusions
Findings
What is your English exam score in College Entrance Examination?

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.