Abstract
The current assessment in language classrooms prevailingly utilizes the criteria provided by instructors, regarding learners as passive recipients of assessment. The current study drew upon sustainable assessment and the community of practice to highlight the importance of involving learners in co-constructing the assessment criteria and argued that using the criteria provided by instructors could lead to discrepancy between assessment, teaching, and learning. It adopted a participatory approach and investigated how to involve learners in co-constructing the assessment criteria with instructors in tertiary English writing instruction in China, based on the European Language Profile (ELP), an evolved version of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Two writing instructors and 146 tertiary students played different, yet interactive roles in adapting the assessment criteria in the local context. Instructors drafted the criteria in line with curricula, teaching, learning and learners. Learners utilized the draft criteria in a training session and suggested possible modifications to the criteria in a survey. Suggestions were used to revise the descriptors alongside teachers’ reflections via reflective logs. A follow-up survey explored students’ perceptions of the feasibility and usefulness of the modified descriptors to investigate the effectiveness of co-constructing the assessment criteria for learning and reveal further improvement if necessary. Vigilant decision-making processes were thickly described regarding how assessment descriptors were selected, arranged, and modified to constructively align them with curricula, teaching, and learning. Statistical and thematic analyses were conducted to examine the accessibility, feasibility, and usefulness of the assessment descriptors prior to and after the modifications. Results substantiated the effectiveness and thus the importance of co-constructing assessment criteria for enhancing the quality of assessment criteria and developing learners’ cognitive and metacognitive knowledge of writing and assessment. Implications for language tutors regarding co-constructing assessment criteria in local contexts were deliberated on at the end of the article.
Highlights
The current study explored how co-constructing assessment criteria could be employed to adapt the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in tertiary EFL (English as a foreign language) writing instruction in China
It is important to consider how the CEFR/European Language Profile (ELP), which was designed as a common assessment framework across contexts, can be translated into context-relevant forms (Byrnes, 2007) because their application requires a shift in pedagogic routines to bring curricula, pedagogy, learning and assessment into productive interaction with one another (Little, 2007)
This study has provided important implications for how to coconstruct the assessment criteria while adapting the CEFR/ELP and other similar frameworks which were designed as a common framework across contexts
Summary
The current study explored how co-constructing assessment criteria could be employed to adapt the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in tertiary EFL (English as a foreign language) writing instruction in China. From the empirical perspective, using the assessment criteria offered by instructors leads to discrepant understanding of the criteria by instructors and students (Andrade & Du, 2007) and subsequent misalignment between teaching and learning These pitfalls suggest the necessity of searching for ways of facilitating learners participating in the process of co-constructing assessment criteria alongside their instructors in local settings. The participative approach aimed to adapt the ELP from students’ and instructors’ perspectives and reshape the prevailing teacher-driven assessment to develop learner autonomy and their assessment literacy The results in this exploratory study are expected to provide implications for language educators regarding how to co-construct assessment criteria with students within local contexts so that the CEFR/ELP or similar common assessment frames could be effectively implemented locally
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.