CNS radiotherapy as bridging prior to CAR T‐cell therapy for hematologic malignancies

Abstract

Introduction: Up to 80% of patients who receive CAR T-cell therapy for central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) require bridging therapy, yet optimal regimens remain undefined. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) is an established strategy for extracranial lymphoma that provides beneficial cytoreduction. However, BRT for CNSL (CNS-BRT) is controversial due to concerns of potential enhanced neurotoxicity. We explored the safety and response profiles for CNS-BRT prior to CAR T therapy. Methods: We identified CAR T patients with hematologic malignancy at MSKCC who received CNS-BRT, defined as treatment delivered between cell collection and infusion to targets in CNS parenchyma, leptomeninges, or epidural space. Safety was evaluated by cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and immune effector cell encephalopathy (ICE) scores, as documented by primary physician. Response was evaluated within the RT field for patients with baseline measurable disease using the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG), Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO), and Response Evaluation Criteria in Lymphoma (RECIL) radiographic criteria for parenchymal, leptomeningeal, and epidural lesions, respectively. Results: 11 patients received CNS-BRT with median follow up of 10.1 months (range: 1.1–25.9). At RT, median age was 51 (25–79), median KPS was 80 (50–90), and 9/11 patients had progressive CNS disease. 8/11 patients received prior methotrexate (high dose n = 7, intrathecal n = 1) with median 39-day interval to RT (0–179). Disease was localized to the brain parenchyma (n = 6), leptomeninges (n = 2), and epidural spine (n = 3). RT targets included whole brain (n = 3), involved site (partial) brain (n = 4), and involved site spine (n = 4), with median dose 24 Gy (20–30). Patient and CAR T cell characteristics are shown in Table 1. 4/10 patients experienced ICANS (n = 1 grade (G) 1, n = 1 G2, n = 1 G3, and n = 1 G4). 8/10 patients experienced CRS (n = 2 G1, n = 5 G2, and n = 1 G3). 6/11 patients required tocilizumab and/or steroids. Patients with G3/4 ICANS had decreased baseline ICE scores of 5 and 6, respectively. Median change in lesion size prior to CAR T infusion was -43.6% (-3.1% to -74.5%) among 7 evaluable patients. Best response included 6 partial responses (PR) and 4 complete responses (CR) at median 4.2 months (0.5–10.4). There were 3 CNS treatment failures, 1 in the leptomeninges and 2 in the paraspinal/epidural space. Keywords: Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Cellular therapies, Radiation Therapy Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. R. Shouval Other remuneration: Medexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MyBiotics P. B. Dahi Other remuneration: Curio Science LLC, Kite Pharmaceuticals, OncLive, Targeted Oncology R. J. Lin Consultant or advisory role: Kite, A Gilead Company M. L. Palomba Other remuneration: BeiGene, Ltd., Mustang Bio, Novartis, Synthekine, Inc. M. Perales Stock ownership: NexImmune, Omeros, Orca Biosystems, Inc. Other remuneration: ADC Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc., CoImmune, Inc., Equillium, Inc., Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Kite Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co Inc., Miltenyi Biotec Incorporated, MorphoSys AG, Novartis, Partners Therapeutics Inc., VectivBio AG, Vor Biopharma Inc. G. Salles Stock ownership: Owkin, Inc. Other remuneration: AbbVie, Aptitude Health, Bayer, BeiGene, Ltd., Bio Ascend, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Epizyme, Everest Clinical Research Corporation, GenMab, Genentech, Gilead Pharmaceutical, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Loxo Oncology, Miltenyi Biotec Incorporated, MorphoSys AG, Nordic Nanovector ASA, Novartis, Physicians' Education Resource, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche, Scientific Education Support Ltd., Takeda Millennium L. Falchi Consultant or advisory role: Genmab, Abbvie, Genentech, ADC therapeutics, Astrazeneca, Seagen, Roche Research funding: Genmab, Abbvie, Roche, Genentech Educational grants: Genmab C. Grommes Other remuneration: BTG International, Ono Pharma, Roche M. Scordo Consultant or advisory role: McKinsey & Company, Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc., Omeros Corporation, Kite – A Gilead Company Honoraria: i3Health, Medscape Research funding: Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc., and Omeros Corporation J. Yahalom Other remuneration: Convergent R.N.R Ltd. B. S. Imber Other remuneration: GT Medical Technologies, Inc.