Abstract

For many decades, the major function of mRNA was thought to be to provide protein-coding information embedded in the genome. The advent of high-throughput sequencing has led to the discovery of pervasive transcription of eukaryotic genomes and opened the world of RNA-mediated gene regulation. Many regulatory RNAs have been found to be incapable of protein coding and are hence termed as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). However, studies in recent years have shown that several previously annotated non-coding RNAs have the potential to encode proteins, and conversely, some coding RNAs have regulatory functions independent of the protein they encode. Such bi-functional RNAs, with both protein coding and non-coding functions, which we term as ‘cncRNAs’, have emerged as new players in cellular systems. Here, we describe the functions of some cncRNAs identified from bacteria to humans. Because the functions of many RNAs across genomes remains unclear, we propose that RNAs be classified as coding, non-coding or both only after careful analysis of their functions.

Highlights

  • The ‘one gene one enzyme’ hypothesis proposed by Beadle and Tatum in 1941 [1] and the elucidation of the double helical structure of DNA in 1953 [2] led Crick to propose of the central dogma of molecular biology placing RNA at the center of the directional information flow from genes to their protein products [3]

  • The discovery of cis-regulatory elements in DNA controlling gene expression by virtue of their interaction with cognate transcription factors captured the imagination and interest of scientists, and for many years, the regulatory roles of RNA were largely ignored. This protein-centric view of gene regulation was challenged by the discovery of small regulatory RNAs and gene silencing by RNA interference (RNAi) [9,10,11]

  • A large number of ncRNAs lacking canonical open reading frame (ORF) are transcribed by polymerase II, spliced, capped and polyadenylated just like messenger RNAs (mRNAs) [145,146]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ‘one gene one enzyme’ hypothesis proposed by Beadle and Tatum in 1941 [1] and the elucidation of the double helical structure of DNA in 1953 [2] led Crick to propose of the central dogma of molecular biology placing RNA at the center of the directional information flow from genes to their protein products [3]. The discovery of cis-regulatory elements in DNA controlling gene expression by virtue of their interaction with cognate transcription factors captured the imagination and interest of scientists, and for many years, the regulatory roles of RNA were largely ignored. This protein-centric view of gene regulation was challenged by the discovery of small regulatory RNAs (e.g., miRNAs) and gene silencing by RNA interference (RNAi) [9,10,11].

Present address
Small regulatory RNAs in bacteria
RNAIII
Bi-functional RNAs in plants
ENOD40
MtHAP2-1
Bi-functional RNAs in animal development
Xenopus VegT
Drosophila oskar
Zebrafish squint
Epigenetic regulation by RNAs
Bi-functional RNAs in disease
DMPK in myotonic dystrophy
Competing endogenous RNAs in cancer
Findings
Conclusion and perspectives
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.