Abstract

BackgroundThe treatment for haematological malignancies is lengthy, complex and intense, leading to potentially debilitating symptoms and reduced health-related quality of life. Patients are living longer due to advancements in early detection and significant improvements in treatment. While treatments for haematological malignancies dramatically increase survivability, many patients suffer from debilitating side effects during and following their treatment. Survivors can suffer long-term effects of both treatment and disease. They may be left with permanent, often devastating, physical impairments leading to an increased risk of other illnesses or a lower quality of life. The presentation is part of a mixed methods study and aims to deepen our understanding of the quality of lives of survivors of adult haematological malignancy. The study will contribute to the under-researched topic related to adult survivors of a haematological malignancy. MethodsThe participants (n=11) were adults who had completed treatment for a haematological malignancy and were between 1-5 years post-treatment. A qualitative research process of inquiry was used to explore the quality of lives of survivors of haematological malignancy. In-depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted, based on the content and structure of the interviews envisaged being grounded in the findings of the quantitative phase of the study. ResultsFour themes and several subthemes were generated and reviewed from the qualitative data analysis. The key themes identified in this cohort were:(1) Physical wellbeing (2) Psychological wellbeing (3) Independence and (4) Supportive care needs. ConclusionsEnhancing these survivors’ physical, psychological wellbeing, an understanding of what independence means to them and addressing supportive care needs can optimise their QoL. Knowledge and understanding of these factors and addressing these needs may provide an insight into implementation measures to enhance the same. Legal entity responsible for the studyRoyal Bournemouth Hospital and Bournemouth University. FundingRoyal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.