Abstract
Forty tumor specimens from patients with ovarian cancer were studied for amplification of the c-myc oncogene relative to chromosome 8 centromere number using dual-color FISH. Interphase cytogenetic analysis showed amplification of the c-myc oncogene in 40% (16/40) of tumors using the standard oncogene:centromere ratio method of analysis. Eleven of these showed moderate amplification of c-myc, and 5 samples showed high amplification. Eight of the sixteen (50%) amplified tumors were polysomic centromere 8 as were 14 of the 24 (58%) non-amplified tumors. In previously reported work with these samples, the oncogene HER-2/neu, the chromosome 17 centromere, and the tumor suppressor gene p53 had been studied. When using the standard oncogene:centromere ratio criteria, 5 samples had amplification of both the c-myc and the HER-2/neu oncogenes, 5 samples had HER-2/neu amplification but not c-myc, 11 samples had c-myc amplification but not HER-2/neu, and 19 samples had neither oncogene amplified. The p53 gene was found to be deleted in 22.5% (9/40) of samples. The loss of the p53 gene did not appear to have any clinical correlation. The presence of an extra centromere 8 also did not appear to have any clinical correlation. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve for those patients who have c-myc amplification, while not statistically significant, appears to show a trend toward poorer survival. The survival curve for patients whose tumors have HER-2/neu amplification shows no clinical significance. It is of great interest, however, that the Kaplan–Meier plot of survival for patients whose tumors have amplification of both c-myc and HER-2/neu shows a significant difference (P = 0.047). The median survival times of the doubly amplified patient group and the non-doubly amplified groups were 12 and 43 months, respectively. This is the first study of the oncogene c-myc using FISH. The results suggest that the amplification of c-myc may indicate a poorer patient survival and that the amplification of both c-myc and HER-2/neu in combination may be a better prognostic indicator of poor patient survival.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
