Abstract
The Professor Rogelio Huerta tells us that in the text there are serious inconsistencies, since it is intended to show that there are eternal and immutable truths, and thereby we run the risk of moving away from the truth, as in the sciences, the checking of the statements has to be done for credibility. To think or assume that there are absolute truths is to get blind faced with a constantly changing reality. Huerta’s research shows that Santiago Levy makes serious flaws, and he aims to demonstrate that the social programs which have been implemented in Mexico have negative effects on the productivity and economic growth of the country. In regard to this point, Huerta shows that the book is illustrative of how seemingly scientific conclusions can be gotten without move an inch from the comfortable place that provides the theory or the idealization of reality through several comments and clarifications of the discussed text.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
