Abstract

Abstract. The main part of the Cluster Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Field Fluctuations (STAFF) experiment consists of triaxial search coils allowing the measurements of the three magnetic components of the waves from 0.1 Hz up to 4 kHz. Two sets of data are produced, one by a module to filter and transmit the corresponding waveform up to either 10 or 180 Hz (STAFF-SC), and the second by the onboard Spectrum Analyser (STAFF-SA) to compute the elements of the spectral matrix for five components of the waves, 3 × B and 2 × E (from the EFW experiment), in the frequency range 8 Hz to 4 kHz. In order to understand the way the output signals of the search coils are calibrated, the transfer functions of the different parts of the instrument are described as well as the way to transform telemetry data into physical units across various coordinate systems from the spinning sensors to a fixed and known frame. The instrument sensitivity is discussed. Cross-calibration inside STAFF (SC and SA) is presented. Results of cross-calibration between the STAFF search coils and the Cluster Fluxgate Magnetometer (FGM) data are discussed. It is shown that these cross-calibrations lead to an agreement between both data sets at low frequency within a 2% error. By means of statistics done over 10 yr, it is shown that the functionalities and characteristics of both instruments have not changed during this period.

Highlights

  • Data calibration of spectra and waveforms issued from a search coil magnetometer is not a new problem

  • The technology used in CLUSTER–Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Field Fluctuations (STAFF) experiments has been substantially upgraded since this epoch, but the principle remains the same: how to calibrate magnetic waveforms issued from a search coil rotating across a high ambient DC field, knowing that the transfer function varies with the frequency? This kind of problem has been solved in this epoch for time– frequency studies (Robert et al, 1978, 1979)

  • A method to calibrate the waveform delivered by a rotating search coil has been proposed, and used for CLUSTER– STAFF-SC data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data calibration of spectra and waveforms issued from a search coil magnetometer is not a new problem. Robert et al.: CLUSTER–STAFF search coil magnetometer calibration field components in this plane, and so compare them with a fluxgate magnetometer instrument This was done in the GEOS epoch, where the agreement found was ∼ 4 % in magnitude and ∼ 4◦ in direction (Robert, 1979b). A special effort to compare STAFF-SC data with the FGM onboard flux gate magnetometer data (Balogh et al, 1997, 2001) has been undertaken from the beginning of the mission until now. This was encouraged by the Cluster Active Archive (CAA) activities and by the organisation of regular cross-calibration meetings.

Instrument description
Initial transfer functions
Corrections applied to the initial transfer functions
In-flight calibration
STAFF sensitivity
Sensor rotation and coordinate systems
Simplification of the cumulative matrix products
Spectrum calibration in sensor frame
Computing calibrated waveforms in the SR2 system
Computing the calibrated spectrum in the SR2 system
Window effect
Summary of the various steps done during spectrum calibration
Method chosen for CLUSTER
Other calibration methods
STAFF-SA Spectrum Analyser
Onboard calculations
Routine on-ground calibration
Power spectra
Wave characteristic determination
Interest of such a study
Data origin
A typical event studied on various scales
Statistic over 10 yr on spin plane DC field
Comparison at 1 Hz
Comparison at 6 Hz
Spectrum comparison
Wide frequency band event
Doppler effect on sensitivity
Findings
10 Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.