Abstract

This article explores how the confessional thrust of Scriptural and root metaphors relates to the Christian scholar’s quest and how choices for hermeneutical keys to Scripture relate to metaphorical keys chosen as means of access to reality. With respect to Biblical interpretation it is argued that the text of Scripture itself provides the theologian or reader with leads concerning the kind of metaphorical access that functions as its hermeneutical key. I argue that there are clusters or hierarchies of metaphors, central and root metaphors, that regulate the interpretation of Scriptural texts and that a redemptive historical reading of Scripture as a confessional text guides the meaning of such clusters and hierarchies of metaphors. I argue that root metaphors in Scripture set the certitudinal parameters for the metaphors chosen and utilised in the disciplines. Regarding reality I argue that the recognition of the multidimensionality of reality and the plurivocity of meaning and signification on which we rely in both literal and metaphorical language use and reference assumes the existence of non-linguistic and preconceptual bases that guide the recognition of similarities, differences and analogies in reality. They in turn are pointers to a design plan for reality which one could call a God-given order of creation. Metaphorical meaning appeals to and presupposes such an ordered and categorised world to which language and texts refer and which provides limits and boundaries to the multiplicity of deferrals of meaning that intertextual relationships seem to imply. In disciplines concerned metaphorical models play a hermeneutical role in the understanding and interpretation of reality. In these metaphorical models, control beliefs steer, guide and condition the access of the discipline to reality. For Christian scholars the ultimate presuppositions embedded in control beliefs need to comport with the thrust of Scripture and its root metaphors. Scholars are at work in God’s creation and their metaphorical approximations of the structures of this creation are guided by the contours of created reality. These approximations in turn are influenced and constrained by what they attribute ultimacy to in the process of attempting to understand this reality. Stable God-given order provides the conditions and parameters for the common differentiation of contexts within which the interpretation of God’s Word in creation is to take place.

Highlights

  • Regarding reality I argue that the recognition of the multidimensionality of reality and the plurivocity of meaning and signification on which we rely in both literal and metaphorical language use and reference assumes the existence of non-linguistic and preconceptual bases that guide the recognition of similarities, differences and analogies in reality

  • In disciplines concerned metaphorical models play a hermeneutical role in the understanding and interpretation of reality

  • For Christian scholars the ultimate presuppositions embedded in control beliefs need to comport with the thrust of Scripture and its root metaphors

Read more

Summary

Some introductory reflections

The central question to be addressed in this article is how a Christian scholar should attempt to relate his or her choices for Biblical points of departure and his Biblical world view to the pursuit of theoretical knowledge concerning the structures for and in God’s world. Not directly addressed in the list mentioned by Brooke, implies the way in which Biblical notions function in the pursuit of Christian scholarship: as a source for theorising. A much-cited example of such an approach from the history of science is James Clerk Maxwell, the nineteenth-century physicist in whose scholarly work the notion of the Trinity is claimed to have played a pivotal role This approach emphasises the stance that if a scientist is guided by or influenced by ideas which have their origin in Scripture, faith or theology, this would be proof of the influence of faith in theorising (Torrance, 1984:215-242). I intend to argue that in this guiding and direction-setting process there are different kinds of Scriptural metaphors, root metaphors and clusters of metaphors In these metaphors a certain hierarchy can be discerned. This approach needs to be differentiated from those that urge a return to Scripture in the limited sense below

Back to Scripture?
Metaphor as views of the world in Scripture and in various disciplines
Contours of the argument
The omnipresence of metaphor in Scripture
Metaphorical keys to Scripture and reality
Religious language between the poles of panliteralism and pan-metaphoricism
Central or privileged metaphors?
The “literal” truth and Biblical metaphor
10. Some concluding reflections
12. Brussel
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call