Abstract

In product development (PD) organizations, coordinating technical dependencies among teams with different expertise in overlapping processes is a fundamental challenge. This article takes a more sophisticated approach than prior methodologies to improve coordination via organizational clustering, by accounting for both team structural and attribute similarity from the perspective of social network analysis. We built models to quantify the impact of the overlapping processes on the interaction strength among PD teams, which we then used to construct structural similarity by combining tie strength and social cohesion among teams via the design structure matrix. To evaluate the organization network, we propose social embeddedness-related centrality indices within (intracluster) and across (intercluster) team groupings. To facilitate knowledge sharing, we base team attribute similarity on product- and process-related expertise among teams. We integrate the modularity index and an improved silhouette index to find an optimal number of clusters, which we then incorporate with team similarity measures as inputs to a spectral clustering algorithm. An industrial example illustrates the proposed model. The clustering results reinforce several managerial practices but also yield new insights, such as how to measure similarity among teams based on organizational network characteristics and how structural and attribute similarities impact the optimal organizational structure.

Highlights

  • A KEY managerial issue in product development (PD) is how to establish an effective organizational architecture to help coordinate hundreds or even thousands of specialists, because the complexity of their interactions may reduce efficiencyManuscript received February 3, 2019; revised June 9, 2019 and August 16, 2019; accepted August 22, 2019

  • This article presented an innovative method for solving two critical issues in PD organizational design: how to quantify the structural and attribute similarities among PD teams from the perspective of social networks and how to identify clusters based on those similarities

  • We provided a framework that enables managers to optimize the PD organizational architecture more effectively

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A KEY managerial issue in product development (PD) is how to establish an effective organizational architecture to help coordinate hundreds or even thousands of specialists, because the complexity of their interactions may reduce efficiency. 2) It extends existing studies on overlapping processes to predict the dyadic interaction strength (social embeddedness) in the PD organizational network, which is used to build the structural similarity measure by combining the direct and indirect TSs. this article makes three key contributions. 1) It takes a more sophisticated view than prior approaches to cluster in PD organizations by accounting for structural and team attribute similarities from the perspective of SNA. 2) It extends existing studies on overlapping processes to predict the dyadic interaction strength (social embeddedness) in the PD organizational network, which is used to build the structural similarity measure by combining the direct and indirect TSs It uses the product- and process-related expertise overlap (EO) among PD teams to measure the team attribute similarity. It uses the product- and process-related expertise overlap (EO) among PD teams to measure the team attribute similarity. 3) It proposes the social embeddedness-related centrality indices of intracluster and intercluster, which are integrated with the Q and S indices to evaluate the clustering results

Organization DSM Modeling and Analysis
Measuring Team Similarity Based on the Organizational Network Characteristics
PD Teams’ Dyadic Interactions Due to Overlapping Processes
Measuring TS and SC in the Organizational Network
Modeling SE-Related Centrality
Modeling Structural Similarity
Modeling Team Attribute Similarity
Spectral Clustering Method and Determining the Optimal Number of Clusters
INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION
Cluster Generation and Selection
Clustering Results
Sensitivity Analysis
Findings
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.