Abstract

The de novo design and biophysical characterization of two 60-residue peptides that dimerize to fold as parallel coiled-coils with different hydrophobic core clustering is described. Our goal was to investigate whether designing coiled-coils with identical hydrophobicity but with different hydrophobic clustering of non-polar core residues (each contained 6 Leu, 3 Ile, and 7 Ala residues in the hydrophobic core) would affect helical content and protein stability. The disulfide-bridged P3 and P2 differed dramatically in alpha-helical structure in benign conditions. P3 with three hydrophobic clusters was 98% alpha-helical, whereas P2 was only 65% alpha-helical. The stability profiles of these two analogs were compared, and the enthalpy and heat capacity changes upon denaturation were determined by measuring the temperature dependence by circular dichroism spectroscopy and confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry. The results showed that P3 assembled into a stable alpha-helical two-stranded coiled-coil and exhibited a native protein-like cooperative two-state transition in thermal melting, chemical denaturation, and calorimetry experiments. Although both peptides have identical inherent hydrophobicity (the hydrophobic burial of identical non-polar residues in equivalent heptad coiled-coil positions), we found that the context dependence of an additional hydrophobic cluster dramatically increased stability of P3 (Delta Tm approximately equal to 18 degrees C and Delta[urea](1/2) approximately equal to 1.5 M) as compared with P2. These results suggested that hydrophobic clustering significantly stabilized the coiled-coil structure and may explain how long fibrous proteins like tropomyosin maintain chain integrity while accommodating polar or charged residues in regions of the protein hydrophobic core.

Highlights

  • Both peptides have identical inherent hydrophobicity, we found that the context dependence of an additional hydrophobic cluster dramatically increased stability of P3 (⌬Tm Ϸ 18 °C and ⌬[urea]1⁄2 Ϸ 1.5 M) as compared with P2

  • Considering that hydrophobic interactions mediate protein folding both in the folded and the unfolded state, several questions arise: 1) How does a cluster of non-polar residues contribute to stability? 2) Is the free energy derived from the burial of hydrophobic residues a sum of the energy derived from the removal of non-polar surface area from aqueous medium? 3) Does hydrophobic clustering enhance stability via favorable enthalpic, geometric packing, and van der Waals interactions?

  • All coiled-coils share a characteristic heplate into the three-dimensional structure necessary for protein tad (7-residue) repeat denoted asn in which nonfunction? hydrophobic interactions are generally ac- polar residues occupy the a and d positions, forming an cepted as the predominant source of free energy change that amphipathic surface where non-polar interactions allowed assembly of two, three, and higher oligomeric states [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Both peptides have identical inherent hydrophobicity (the hydrophobic burial of identical non-polar residues in equivalent heptad coiled-coil positions), we found that the context dependence of an additional hydrophobic cluster dramatically increased stability of P3 (⌬Tm Ϸ 18 °C and ⌬[urea]1⁄2 Ϸ 1.5 M) as compared with P2. The secondary structure formation and hydrophobic collapse of coiled-coils are tightly coupled and cooperative since single-stranded amphipathic ␣-helices are unstable in aqueous medium. This hydrophobic surface where amphipathic ␣-helices interact via hydrophobic interactions provides an ideal model to test the effects of hydrophobic clustering. The results are discussed in the context of non-polar residue clustering enhancing protein stability

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call