Abstract

BackgroundThere is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. This paper reports on the methodological issues identified during the implementation of two cluster randomized trials using the electronic health records of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).MethodsTwo trials were completed in primary care: one aimed to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection; the other aimed to increase physician adherence with secondary prevention interventions after first stroke. The paper draws on documentary records and trial datasets to report on the methodological experience with respect to research ethics and research governance approval, general practice recruitment and allocation, sample size calculation and power, intervention implementation, and trial analysis.ResultsWe obtained research governance approvals from more than 150 primary care organizations in England, Wales, and Scotland. There were 104 CPRD general practices recruited to the antibiotic trial and 106 to the stroke trial, with the target number of practices being recruited within six months. Interventions were installed into practice information systems remotely over the internet. The mean number of participants per practice was 5,588 in the antibiotic trial and 110 in the stroke trial, with the coefficient of variation of practice sizes being 0.53 and 0.56 respectively. Outcome measures showed substantial correlations between the 12 months before, and after intervention, with coefficients ranging from 0.42 for diastolic blood pressure to 0.91 for proportion of consultations with antibiotics prescribed, defining practice and participant eligibility for analysis requires careful consideration.ConclusionsCluster randomized trials may be performed efficiently in large samples from UK general practices using the electronic health records of a primary care database. The geographical dispersal of trial sites presents a difficulty for research governance approval and intervention implementation. Pretrial data analyses should inform trial design and analysis plans.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN 47558792 and ISRCTN 35701810 (both registered on 17 March 2010).

Highlights

  • There is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records

  • This paper aims to report on methodological issues in the design, conduct, and analysis of these two cluster randomized trials in the Electronic health record (EHR) of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

  • The active intervention consisted of a set of educational and decision support tools that were remotely installed into the software system of participating general practices and activated during consultations with eligible participants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. Recent developments in electronic health records (EHRs), and their increasing accessibility for health research, have stimulated interest in utilizing EHRs for intervention studies in clinical medicine, public health, and health services research [1]. This approach to trial conduct offers several potential advantages over traditional trials. Trials using EHRs may have high external validity because of the representativeness of the samples that may be recruited and the use of interventions that are similar to those that may be rolled out into routine service settings. CPRD data are presently being enriched through linkages with other data sources including disease registry data [6,7] and data on hospital utilisation and mortality records

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call