Abstract
Introduction: cluster headaches (CS) are a subtype of primary headache disorder characterized by daily pain attacks of 15-180 minutes for weeks to months, usually interspersed with periods of remission. Painful crises are very intense, of periorbital or orbital location, associated with symptoms of autonomic dysfunction. Despite its unique clinical presentation, CS remains under-recognized and underdiagnosed. Objectives: To describe and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of CS based on clinical cases. Methods: this is a series of five cases of CS under clinical monitoring. Results: Of the 467 patients treated at the neurological clinic five had a diagnosis of CS, corresponding to 1.07% of the total. The clinical presentation varied little in relation to the description in the literature; it affected predominantly men, episodically. Time elapsed between onset and diagnosis was usually long. Conclusion: Even in a tertiary care neurological center, the number of diagnosed patients is small, which reflects on ignorance about CS and contributes to late diagnosis and lack of specific treatment.
Highlights
Introduction: cluster headaches (CS) are a subtype of primary headache disorder characterized by daily pain attacks of 15-180 minutes for weeks to months, usually interspersed with periods of remission
To describe and discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of CS based on clinical cases
Methods: this is a series of five cases of CS under clinical monitoring
Summary
Cinthia Francesca Barra Rocha[1], Kézia Betânia da Silva[1], Rafael Mattos Tavares[1], Ariovaldo Alberto da Silva Junior[2], Rodrigo Santiago Gomez[2], Antônio Lúcio Teixeira[2]. Apesar de sua singular apresentação clínica, a CS permanece afecção pouco reconhecida e subdiagnosticada. Objetivos: descrever e discutir os desafios diagnósticos e terapêuticos da CS a partir de casos clínicos. Material e método: trata-se de uma série de cinco casos de CS em acompanhamento clínico. Resultados: dos 467 pacientes assistidos em ambulatório neurológico, cinco possuíam diagnóstico de CS, correspondendo a 1,07% do total. A apresentação clínica variou pouco em relação à descrição da literatura, com predomínio em homens e da forma episódica, além de haver grande latência entre seu surgimento e o diagnóstico. Conclusão: mesmo em centro terciário de atendimento neurológico, o número de pacientes diagnosticados é pequeno, colaborando para o desconhecimento a respeito da CS, o que contribui para o seu atraso diagnóstico e tratamento específico.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
