Abstract

We review various aspects of cluster algebras and the ways in which they appear in the study of loop-level amplitudes in planar mathcal{N}=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. In particular, we highlight the different forms of cluster-algebraic structure that appear in this theory’s two-loop MHV amplitudes — considered as functions, symbols, and at the level of their Lie cobracket — and recount how the ‘nonclassical’ part of these amplitudes can be decomposed into specific functions evaluated on the A2 or A3 subalgebras of Gr(4, n). We then extend this line of inquiry by searching for other subalgebras over which these amplitudes can be decomposed. We focus on the case of seven-particle kinematics, where we show that the nonclassical part of the two-loop MHV amplitude is also constructible out of functions evaluated on the D5 and A5 subalgebras of Gr(4, 7), and that these decompositions are themselves decomposable in terms of the same A4 function. These nested decompositions take an especially canonical form, which is dictated in each case by constraints arising from the automorphism group of the parent algebra.

Highlights

  • Calculating two loop amplitudes for any number of particles [9, 10]

  • We focus on the case of seven-particle kinematics, where we show that the nonclassical part of the two-loop MHV amplitude is constructible out of functions evaluated on the D5 and A5 subalgebras of Gr(4, 7), and that these decompositions are themselves decomposable in terms of the same A4 function

  • All six- and seven-particle next-to-MHV (NMHV) amplitudes that have currently been computed in this theory share these remarkable properties [6,7,8, 15,16,17,18,19], as do certain classes of Feynman integrals [14, 20,21,22], some of which have been computed to all loop orders [23]

Read more

Summary

A brief introduction to cluster algebras

Cluster algebras were first introduced by Fomin and Zelevinsky [33] as a tool for identifying which algebraic varieties come equipped with a natural notion of positivity, and what quantities determine this positivity. Cluster algebras answer questions about positivity for a larger class of algebraic varieties (and in particular for all Gr+(k, n)) by considering ‘clusters’ that can all be generated by an operation called ‘mutation’ just as all triangulations of the pentagon are generated by flipping the diagonals of quadrilateral faces. The nodes of our cluster are given by the lines of this triangulation (making the minors ab our cluster coordinates), where an arrow is assigned from ab to cd if the triangle orientations in (2.5) have segment (ab) flowing into segment (cd) and these segments border. It is common to refer to certain cluster algebras by nice representative clusters, when the mutable notes of the corresponding quiver form an oriented Dynkin diagram. We will see why this language is useful

Cluster X -coordinates
Subalgebras and cluster polytopes
Daniel Parker
Finite cluster algebras
Cluster automorphisms
Cluster polylogarithms and MHV amplitudes
The symbol and cobracket
Cluster-algebraic structure at two loops
Subalgebra structure and cluster polylogarithms
Nonclassical cluster polylogarithms
A2 functions as a basis
Nested cluster polylogarithms
Conclusion
A Counting subalgebras of finite cluster algebras
B Cobracket spaces in finite cluster algebras
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call