Clown doctors and forensic paediatricians enhance the patient experience at the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne

Abstract

We evaluated medical clown intervention in suspected child abuse and neglect assessments. A mixed method methodology (Likert scales and free text responses) was used to measure the impact of clown doctors at 49 forensic consultations. Of 35 responding children, 43 per cent reported neutral or negative feelings on arrival whereas 97 per cent reported either positive feelings or sadness at leaving the clown doctor. Children’s memories of the consultation were of interacting with clown doctors, not their physical examinations. Of 45 responding caregivers, 95 per cent deemed the clown doctor developed a positive connection with the child, 96 per cent felt their child enjoyed their visit and 93 per cent felt the clown doctor improved their own experience. Both caregivers (94%) and paediatricians (92%) valued an opportunity to talk privately while children engaged with clown doctors. All 45 responding caregivers felt their child would be willing to return to hospital in the future. In all 49 cases, paediatricians reported that clown doctors increased children’s willingness to cooperate with the medical assessment. Forensic paediatricians (92%) reported that clown doctors actively supported the medical evaluation process while 100 per cent reported no harm from the intervention. We concluded that clown doctors positively impact the patient, carer and paediatricians experience during children’s forensic medical assessments.