Abstract
The discussion-paper published by Roeder et al. (2021), hereafter referred to as the responders for clarity, disputes the results published by Hadad and Fortney (2020), and the chevron effect (CE) analysis method published by Fortney and Thornton (2015, 2017) based on the responders’ earlier research results and their understanding of the behavior of chevron beams. This paper provides the reply to the disputed topics.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
