Abstract

In geometrically frustrated clusters of polyhedra, gaps between faces can be closed without distorting the polyhedra by the long established method of discrete curvature, which consists of curving the space into a fourth dimension, resulting in a dihedral angle at the joint between polyhedra in 4D. An alternative method—the twist method—has been recently suggested for a particular case, whereby the gaps are closed by twisting the cluster in 3D, resulting in an angular offset of the faces at the joint between adjacent polyhedral. In this paper, we show the general applicability of the twist method, for local clusters, and present the surprising result that both the required angle of the twist transformation and the consequent angle at the joint are the same, respectively, as the angle of bending to 4D in the discrete curvature and its resulting dihedral angle. The twist is therefore not only isomorphic, but isogonic (in terms of the rotation angles) to discrete curvature. Our results apply to local clusters, but in the discussion we offer some justification for the conjecture that the isomorphism between twist and discrete curvature can be extended globally. Furthermore, we present examples for tetrahedral clusters with three-, four-, and fivefold symmetry.

Highlights

  • Geometric frustration is the failure of local order to propagate freely throughout space, where local order refers to a local arrangement of geometric shapes, and free propagation refers to the filling of the space with copies of this arrangement without gaps, overlaps, or distortion [1]

  • We show that the twist method works quite generally to close gaps between face planes for polyhedron clusters with any dihedral angle and gap size

  • We mention distortion because it is the result of the 3D projection of discrete curvature, and it can be important in atomic configurations, but, in this paper, we restrict our attention to the relation between the isometric methods, which close the gaps by some type of rotation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Geometric frustration is the failure of local order to propagate freely throughout space, where local order refers to a local arrangement of geometric shapes, and free propagation refers to the filling of the space with copies of this arrangement without gaps, overlaps, or distortion [1]. A traditional solution to relieve the frustration in nD is to curve the space into (n + 1)D so that the vertices of the prototiles (pentagons in the 2D example) all land on an n-sphere (dodecahedron) and the discrete curvature is concentrated at the joints between prototiles (dodecahedral edges and vertices) This eliminates the deficit in the dihedral angle to close a circle. For a particular vertex-sharing configuration, Fang et al [3] showed an alternative called the twist method, an isometry on the tetrahedra that closes the gaps without recourse to a fourth dimension. Similar calculations can be applied to any symmetric cluster of polyhedra

Description of Discrete Curvature and Twist Methods
Discrete Curvature
Equivalence between the Discrete Curvature and Twist Methods
Angle Matching between Discrete Curvature and Twist Transformations
Basic Definitions
Reflections
Definitions of Transformations
Equivalence of Transformation Angles
Equivalence of Joint Angles
Discussion and Outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call