Abstract

AbstractContrary to most French grammars claiming that French only allows masculine agreement when mixed-gender nouns are conjoined, we show that closest conjunct agreement (CCA) does exist in contemporary French, as in other Romance languages, and is the preferred strategy for prenominal adjectives. Using data from a large corpus (FrWac) and an acceptability rating experiment, we show that (feminine) CCA is well accepted in contemporary French, and should be distinguished from attraction errors, despite the norm prescribing masculine agreement. We also show the role of the adjective position, i.e. prenominal or post-nominal, and humanness. CCA is the preferred strategy for prenominal adjectives, and non-human nouns favour CCA for post-nominal adjectives. Assuming a hierarchical structure for coordination, the closest noun is the highest in A-N order, whereas it is the lowest in N-A order. Thus CCA in prenominal position may be favoured by a shorter structural distance. One can also see CCA with a prenominal adjective as ‘early’ agreement. Regarding humanness, grammatical gender is interpreted as social gender with human nouns, and a masculine plural can refer to a mixed group. This ‘gender neutral’ plural may favour masculine agreement for human nouns, or the prescriptive norm is more influential for human nouns.

Highlights

  • Agreement with coordination is a complex issue and different languages may use different strategies

  • The experimental items were rated higher than the ungrammatical controls, but lower than the grammatical controls

  • We were able to show that conjunct agreement (CCA) plays an important role in attributive adjective agreement, using a large corpus of contemporary French and an acceptability experiment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agreement with coordination is a complex issue and different languages may use different strategies (cf. Sadler, 1999; Wechsler and Zlatic, 2000; Kuhn et al, 2007; Borsley, 2009; Dalrymple and Hristov, 2010). When the coordination includes conjuncts with conflicting features, languages may follow resolution rules (cf Givon, 1970; Dalrymple and Kaplan, 2000) or use closest conjunct agreement (cf Corbett, 1991; Wechsler and Zlatic, 2003). A single language, such as Latin, may use different strategies in case of coordination of nouns with different genders: masculine resolution (1-a) (for human nouns) or agreement with the closest conjunct (1-b)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call