Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning versus open reduction and internal fixation for Jakob type 3 lateral condyle fractures in children.

Abstract

The management of type 3 lateral condyle fractures (LCFs) remains controversial. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) in patients with type 3 LCFs and to assess the outcome of such injuries according to the type of treatment, CRPP, or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). This is a retrospective review of prospectively enrolled children with type 3 LCF managed by CRPP or ORIF between 2018 and 2021. All patients were followed for at least 12months. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of treatment, CRPP or ORIF. Demographic characteristics were recorded for all patients. Standard radiographs were used to identify, evaluate, and classify each fracture and to detect the presence of other concomitant bone lesions. The clinical outcome was assessed according to the Hardacre et al. criteria. Seventy-eight children with type 3 LCF were included; 42 were treated by CRPP (53.8%) and 36 by ORIF (46.2%); the mean follow-up time was 17.7months (range, 12.3-40.9). The baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups of patients. Overall, successful CRPP could be achieved in 39 out of 42 patients (92.9%). The mean surgical time was 63.4 and 84.5min in patients treated by CRPP and ORIF, respectively (p = 0.01). Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in patients managed by ORIF than in those treated by CRPP (12 versus 40s, respectively; p < 0.001). Clinical outcome according to the Hardacre et al. criteria was excellent in 37 out of 39 (94.4%) and in 35 out of 36 patients (97.2%) treated by CRPP and ORIF, respectively (p = 0.09). CRPP management of paediatric type 3 LCF has clinical and radiographic outcomes similar to ORIF; if satisfactory reduction cannot be achieved by CRPP, conversion to ORIF should be considered.