Abstract

While some studies have shown that the closed embryo culture system (CCS) is a possible improvement over standard embryo culture systems (STS) in terms of early embryonic development, information on clinical outcomes of culturing blastocysts following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) in the CCS and STS remains limited. Therefore, the objective of this single-center, large-cohort, retrospective study was to compare embryonic development until the blastocyst stage and clinical outcomes following SVBT between CCS and STS. From May 2017 to October 2018, 2420 oocytes from 1402 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization and blastocyst culture after minimal stimulation were divided into two groups (CCS and STS). The main outcome measures in the two groups were embryological (blastocyst formation rates and utilized blastocyst rates) and clinical outcomes (ongoing pregnancy rates) after a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT). There were no significant differences in the blastocyst formation rates between the CCS and STS groups (59.6% versus 59.1%, p = 0.81). However, there were significant differences in utilized blastocyst rates (51.0% versus 46.6%, p < 0.05). Ongoing pregnancy rates per SVBT cycle were significantly higher in the CCS group than in the STS group (41.4% versus 34.4%, p < 0.05). Moreover, after applying multivariable logistic regression analysis, the type of embryo culture system (CCS to STS, adjusted odds ratios: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04–1.91) was correlated with ongoing pregnancy. Our study suggests that compared to STS, CCS could improve utilized blastocyst rates and ongoing pregnancy rates to a greater extent, following SVBT.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.