Close‐kin methods to estimate census size and effective population size

Abstract

AbstractThe last two decades have witnessed rapid developments and increasing interest in use of: (1) genetic methods to estimate effective population size (Ne) and (2) close‐kin mark–recapture (CKMR) methods to estimate abundance based on the incidence of close relatives. WhereasNeestimation methods have been applied to a wide range of taxa, all CKMR applications to date have been for aquatic species. These two fields of inquiry have developed largely independently, and this is unfortunate because deeper insights can be gained by joint evaluation of eco‐evolutionary processes. In this synthesis, we use simple analytical models and simulated pedigree data to illustrate how various factors (life‐history traits; patterns of variation in individual reproductive success; experimental design; stochasticity; marker type) can affect the performance of the estimators. We show that theNe/Nratio and the probability of a close‐kin match both depend on a vector of parental weights that specify relative probabilities that different individuals will produce offspring. Although age‐specific vital rates are central to both methodologies, for CKMR they can potentially bias abundance estimates unless properly accounted for, whereas they represent the signals of genetic drift thatNeestimation methods depend upon. CoordinatingNeand CKMR estimation methods using the same or overlapping datasets would facilitate joint evaluation of both the ecological and evolutionary consequences of abundance.