Abstract

Context: Increased selectivity of the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib may improve tolerability. Objective: To compare acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Design: Open-label, randomized, noninferiority, phase 3 trial. Patients: Previously treated CLL patients with del(17p) or del(11q) by central lab. Interventions: Oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily (BID) or ibrutinib 420 mg once daily (QD) (stratified by del(17p) status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [2 vs ≤ 1], and number of prior therapies [1–3 vs ≥4]) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Main Outcome Measures: Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by independent review committee; secondary endpoints of all-grade atrial fibrillation (AF), grade ≥3 infection, Richter transformation, and overall survival (OS) were assessed in hierarchical order. Results: 533 patients (acalabrutinib, n=268; ibrutinib, n=265) were randomized (median age 66 years; median 2 prior therapies; del(17p) 45.2%; del(11q) 64.2%). At a median follow-up of 40.9 months (range 0.0–59.1), acalabrutinib was noninferior to ibrutinib with a median PFS of 38.4 months in both arms (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.79–1.27). Acalabrutinib was statistically superior to ibrutinib in all-grade AF incidence (9.4% vs 16.0%; P=0.023). Among other secondary endpoints, incidences of grade ≥3 infection (acalabrutinib: 30.8%, ibrutinib: 30.0%) and Richter transformation (acalabrutinib: 3.8%, ibrutinib: 4.9%) were comparable between arms. Median OS was not reached in either arm (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59–1.15), with 63 (23.5%) deaths in the acalabrutinib arm and 73 (27.5%) in the ibrutinib arm. Among any-grade adverse events (AEs) in ≥20% of patients in either arm, acalabrutinib was associated with lower incidence of hypertension (9.4%, 23.2%), arthralgia (15.8%, 22.8%), and diarrhea (34.6%, 46.0%) but a higher incidence of headache (34.6%, 20.2%) and cough (28.9%, 21.3%). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 14.7% of acalabrutinib- versus 21.3% of ibrutinib-treated patients. Any-grade AEs of clinical interest that were less frequent with acalabrutinib included cardiac (24.1% vs 30.0%), hypertension (above), and bleeding events (38.0% vs 51.3%). Conclusions: In this first head-to-head trial of BTKis in CLL, acalabrutinib demonstrated noninferior PFS with less cardiotoxicity and fewer discontinuations due to AEs versus ibrutinib.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call