Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can be divided into two morphological subtypes: large duct type and small duct type ICC. This study aims to verify the feasibility of the classification criteria and clinicopathological characteristics of ICC.Research design and methodsICC patients were divided into the large and small type ICC by morphological and immunohistochemical patterns. Subsequently, clinicopathological data of the two groups was compared and the multivariate COX regression was used to verify the clinical significance of ICC subtypes. In addition, IDH1/2 mutation, KRAS mutation and FGFR2 translocation was also evaluated.ResultsTotally, 32, 61 and 13 tumors were defined as large, small and the indeterminate-duct type ICC respectively. Clinicopathologically, the large and small duct type ICC showed distinct morphological features. Compared with the small duct type ICC, the large duct type ICC had higher levels of serum tumor markers, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative recurrence. Furthermore, positive FGFR2 rearrangement occurred only in small duct type ICC and IDH1/2 was mutated mainly in small duct type ICC.ConclusionsThe subclassification system was applicable and the ICC subtypes had distinct clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic outcome, and IDH1/2 mutation pattern.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
