Clinicopathological and computed tomography features of patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer harboring ALK rearrangement

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough some studies have assessed the correlation between computed tomography (CT) features and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), few have focused on early-stage patients. The results of some previous studies are inconsistent and contradictory. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological and CT features of patients with early-stage NSCLC harboring ALK rearrangement.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 65 patients with ALK rearrangement and 629 ALK-negative patients. All patients had surgically resected NSCLC and were diagnosed with stage IA or stage IIB NSCLC. Clinicopathological features and CT signs, including tumor size and density, consolidation tumor ratio (CTR), lesion location, round or irregular shape, lobulated or spiculated margins, air bronchograms, bubble-like lucency or cavities, and pleural retraction, were investigated according to different genotypes.ResultsThe prevalence of ALK rearrangement in patients with early-stage NSCLC was 9.3% (65/694). Patients with ALK rearrangement were significantly younger than those without ALK rearrangement (P = 0.033). The frequency of moderate cell differentiation was significantly lower in tumors with ALK rearrangement than in those without ALK rearrangement (46.2% vs. 59.8%, P = 0.034). The frequency of the mucinous subtype was significantly higher in the ALK-positive group than in the ALK-negative group (13.8% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.007). No significant differences were found in any CT signs between the ALK-positive and ALK-negative groups.ConclusionsPatients with ALK-positive lung cancer may have specific clinicopathological features, including younger age, lower frequency of moderate cell differentiation, and higher frequency of the mucinous type. CT features may not correlate with ALK rearrangement in early-stage lung cancer. Immunohistochemistry or next-generation sequencing is needed to further clarify the genomic mutation status.