Abstract

Aim: Medullary ray injury was recently reported in renal transplant biopsies. This study was performed to clarify the clinicopathological features of medullary ray injury in paediatric living renal transplant recipients. Methods: Paediatric recipients who completed a 5-year follow-up after living renal transplantation were enroled. We evaluated the clinical and pathological parameters of the presence or absence of medullary ray injury in their 1-year protocol biopsies. Results: Of 48 1-year protocol biopsies, 18 (37.5%) showed histological evidence of medullary ray injury. The 48 paediatric recipients were classified as those with medullary ray injury (n = 18; MRI-1Y [+] group) and those without medullary ray injury (n = 30; MRI-1Y [−] group) in the 1-year protocol biopsies. The prevalence of histological evidence of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity, chronic obstruction or reflux nephropathy, and imaging findings of vesicoureteral reflux was 66.7, 22.2, and 7.7% in the MRI-1Y (+) group and 33.3, 13.3, and 15.4% in the MRI-1Y (−) group, respectively. Only the prevalence of CNI nephrotoxicity was significantly different between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1, 3, or 5 years after transplantation between the 2 groups. Conclusion: In total, 37.5% of 1-year protocol biopsies showed histological evidence of medullary ray injury. This finding suggests that CNI nephrotoxicity might be the main contributor to medullary ray injury in 1-year protocol biopsies. The presence of medullary ray injury had little influence on renal function, at least during the first 5 years after transplantation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.