Abstract

Purpose To retrospectively review the pathologic diagnoses and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Methods Specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001 in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory were reviewed. All of the specimens included a lacrimal sac biopsy specimen. The pathologic diagnoses were recorded. The clinical features of the patients with significant pathologic abnormalities were reviewed to determine if the pathology was suspected before or at the time of the DCR. Results There were 377 DCR specimens from 316 patients representing 1.8% of 21,018 ophthalmic pathology specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001. Diagnoses, in decreasing order of frequency, were nongranulomatous inflammation (321, 85.1%), granulomatous inflammation consistent with sarcoidosis (8, 2.1%), lymphoma (7, 1.9%), papilloma (4, 1.11%), lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (4, 1.1%), transitional cell carcinoma (2, 0.5%), and single cases of adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, granular cell tumor, plasmacytoma, and leukemic infiltrate. A total of 31 (8.2%) specimens from 25 (7.9%) of patients demonstrated significant pathology. Among 17 specimens (4.5%) from 14 patients with neoplasms whose clinical histories were available, 8 (2.1%) were not suspected before surgery. Conclusions Nongranulomatous inflammation consistent with chronic dacryocystitis is the most common diagnosis in lacrimal sac specimens obtained at DCR. Neoplasms resulting in chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction occurred in 4.6% of cases and were unsuspected before surgery in 2.1% of patients. We recommend pathologic examination of DCR specimens.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.