Abstract
Abstract Background: Dermatophytosis is a major public health concern in India, especially in recent years, with an alarmingly rising trend, particularly in relation to recurrent and chronic infection. The number of studies examining the relationship between an individual’s glycemic status and the development of dermatophytosis, and a comparison of the evolving species trend between diabetic and non-diabetic patients infected with dermatophytes, is limited. Aims and Objectives: To study and compare the clinical and mycological aspects of dermatophytosis among diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to compare the culture isolates in both groups. Materials and Methods: The study included 378 patients of clinically suspected dermatophytosis, divided into two groups of 189 known diabetics and non-diabetics each. We subsequently analysed and compared the demographics, clinical data, potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount, calcofluor white (CW) staining and fungal culture results of all patients in both groups. Results: Among the 378 patients, diabetic patients had a significantly greater extent of involvement and higher rates of recurrence when compared to non-diabetics. The overall positivity rate was higher in CW staining (77.8%) as compared to KOH (57.7%) in both non-diabetics and diabetics. Trichophyton mentagrophytes was the most common isolate (47.6%) in both diabetic (55.0%) and non-diabetic (61.4%) patients, followed by Trichophyton rubrum (31.8% and 29.6%, respectively). The positivity percentages of fungal culture, KOH and CW staining increased to 100%, 77.9% and 95.7%, respectively, when scrapings were taken from ≥2 sites. Conclusion: The pattern of dermatophytosis is comparatively more chronic and severe in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. T. mentagrophytes was the most common culture isolate in both groups. CW staining can potentially be used as the initial method of choice for the diagnosis of dermatophytosis as it has significantly outperformed the conventional KOH mount. Scrapings can regularly be taken from ≥2 sites to avoid false negative results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
