Abstract

Background:Routine HIV screening rates are suboptimal.Objectives:This systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening.Data Sources:Included articles were indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between 2006 and October 2018.Eligibility Criteria:Included studies were published in English or Spanish and directly assessed providers’ barriers/facilitators to routine screening.Data Extraction:We used a standardized Excel template to extract barriers/facilitators and identify levels in the SEM.Data Synthesis:Intrapersonal factors predominated as barriers, while facilitators were directed at the institutional level.Limitations:Policy barriers are not universal across countries. Meta-analysis was not possible. We could not quantify frequency of any given barrier/facilitator.Conclusions:Increasing reimbursement and adding screening as a quality measure may incentivize HIV testing; however, many interventions would require little resource investment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call