Clinically Suspicious Cases of Hansen's Disease at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Clinicopathological Study.

Abstract

Background and objective Hansen's disease, also known as leprosy, is a chronic granulomatous condition caused by Mycobacterium leprae, primarily affecting the skin and peripheral nerves. The disease has a wide spectrum of clinical and histopathological manifestations, often mimicking other inflammatory and infectious conditions. This variability poses significant challenges in its early diagnosis and management. Aligning clinical suspicion with histopathological evidence is critical for effective treatment and control of transmission. This study was designed to explore the concordance between clinical impressions and histopathological diagnoses and to understand the diagnostic utility of various histopathological techniques. We aimed to establish and correlate the histopathological types of leprosy with clinical presentations. We also sought to determine the extent to which different histopathological techniques, including special stains, can corroborate with clinical types, thereby enhancing diagnostic precision. Materials and methods This was a hospital-based, retrospective study of clinically suspicious cases of leprosy at a tertiary care hospital in South India. A total of 100 cases of various age groups were identified and included in the study. All cases underwent skin biopsy with samples subjected to routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) staining for the detection oflepra bacilli. Results Among the 100 clinically suspicious cases of leprosy, 50were histopathologically confirmed as leprosy and 50were categorized as non-specific dermatitis. Among the 50 histologically confirmed cases of leprosy, the most common type was lepromatous leprosy (LL) (38%) followed by borderline tuberculoid (BT) (30%) leprosy.Modified AFBstain was positive in 21 cases and was instrumental in confirming the suspected cases of leprosy. The overall correlation between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis was significant, with the highest correlation noted in LL cases. Conclusions Our findings underscorethe complexity of diagnosing leprosy due to its varied clinical and pathological presentations. Despite a high overall concordance rate, the discrepancies between clinical impressions and histopathological findings observed highlight the need for a multidimensional diagnostic approach. Incorporating a combination of clinical assessment, routine histology, and special staining can enhance diagnostic accuracy, leading to better patient management and outcomes.