Clinically significant differences between point-of-care analysers and a standard analyser for monitoring the International Normalized Ratio in oral anticoagulant therapy: a multi-instrument evaluation in a hospital outpatient setting

Abstract

The increasing number of patients requiring oral anticoagulant therapy has lead to an expansion in the use of point-of-care test (POCT) analysers for measuring the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for monitoring purposes. Availability of new technology inevitably leads to comparisons with standard methodologies, and studies to date have reached varying conclusions about the comparability of POCT INRs with conventional testing. We compared the performance of five POCT instruments (Hemochron Junior Signature, ProTime, CoaguChek S, INRatio and TAS) against Innovin thromboplastin on a Sysmex CA1500 automated analyser. The Hemochron Junior Signature, ProTime and CoaguChek S demonstrated strong correlation with the laboratory method (R2 > 0.94). These three analysers demonstrated higher percentages of paired results within 0.5 INR units (81.5, 92.0 and 74.0%, respectively); the INRatio and TAS demonstrated 54.2 and 62.2%, respectively. Within INR ranges of up to 2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0 and above 4.0, none of the POCT analysers demonstrated significant agreement with the standard method in every range. All POCT instruments showed a degree of bias and greater variation from the standard method at INR values above 3.0. These data indicate the potential for POCT analysers to generate INR values sufficiently different from conventional methods that they may impact on clinical decision-making.