Abstract

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive presentation of invasive breast cancer with a 62% to 68% 5-year survival rate. It is the most lethal form of breast cancer, and early recognition and treatment is important for patient survival. Like non-inflammatory breast cancer, IBC comprises multiple subtypes, with the triple-negative subtype being overrepresented. Although the current multimodality treatment regime of anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy has improved the outcome of patients with triple-negative IBC, overall survival continues to be worse than in patients with non-inflammatory locally advanced breast cancer. Translation of new therapies into the clinics to successfully treat IBC has been poor, in part because of the lack of in vitro preclinical models that can accurately predict the response of the original tumor to therapy. We report the generation of a preclinical IBC patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-derived ex vivo (PDXEx) model and show that it closely replicates the tissue architecture of the original PDX tumor harvested from mice. The gene expression profile of our IBC PDXEx model had a high degree of correlation to that of the original tumor. This suggests that the process of generating the PDXEx model did not significantly alter the molecular signature of the original tumor. We demonstrate a high degree of similarity in drug response profile between a PDX mouse model and our PDXEx model generated from the same original PDX tumor tissue and treated with the same panel of drugs, indicating that our PDXEx model had high predictive value in identifying effective tumor-specific therapies. Finally, we used our PDXEx model as a platform for a robotic-based high-throughput drug screen of a 386-drug anti-cancer compound library. The top candidates identified from this drug screen all demonstrated greater therapeutic efficacy than the standard-of-care drugs used in the clinic to treat triple-negative IBC, doxorubicin and paclitaxel. Our PDXEx model is simple, and we are confident that it can be incorporated into a PDX mouse system for use as a first-pass screening platform. This will permit the identification of effective tumor-specific therapies with high predictive value in a resource-, time-, and cost-efficient manner.

Highlights

  • Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare, clinically and pathologically unique breast cancer subtype [1] that accounts for 2% to 6% of all breast cancers diagnosed in the United States [2,3,4,5,6] but 7% to 10% of all breast-cancer-related deaths [6,7,8,9,10]

  • Using previously described methodology [52], the cellular milieu released from a Bcx087 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumor was tagged with a nanoparticle assembly of iron oxide and iron nanoparticles cross-linked with poly-L-lysine (NanoshuttleTM) and placed under a magnetic field (BioAssemblerTM), resulting in the cells’ been drawn together into a levitating mass (Fig 1A)

  • To determine the similarity between the tissue architecture of the original PDX tumor and the PDX-derived ex vivo (PDXEx) model, tissue sections were generated from the respective samples and analyzed by immunohistochemistry

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare, clinically and pathologically unique breast cancer subtype [1] that accounts for 2% to 6% of all breast cancers diagnosed in the United States [2,3,4,5,6] but 7% to 10% of all breast-cancer-related deaths [6,7,8,9,10]. In an attempt to improve this unfavorable outcome, the International Expert Panel on IBC proposed clinical guidelines important for the diagnosis of this disease [17,19, 22]. These guidelines state that in order for IBC to be diagnosed, the clinical presentation should include erythema, edema, peau d’orange, and/or warm breast with or without an underlying palpable mass and a duration of no more than 6 months with erythema occupying at least one-third of the breast. Patients with primary IBC present with characteristic clinical signs and symptoms [2], the molecular mechanisms modulating these presentations are poorly understood

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call