Clinical utility of irx3 in keratoconus

Abstract

ABSTRACT Clinical relevance Diagnosis and monitoring of keratoconus is increasingly being conducted with the aid of imaging equipment such as corneal aberrometry. There is a need to also know the confidence with which ocular aberration measurements can be made. Background To assess the repeatability of lower‐ and higher‐order aberration measurements in patients with keratoconus using the irx3 wavefront aberrometer (Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France) and evaluate correlations with corneal curvature. Methods The irx3 wavefront aberrometer was used to measure bilateral lower‐ and higher‐order ocular aberrations on 33 participants with keratoconus. Three measurements were taken from each eye to determine the repeatability of lower‐order aberrations (quantified as sphere and cylinder in dioptres) and higher‐order aberration co‐efficients (up to eighth order in micrometres), coma, trefoil and total higher‐order aberration root mean square (in micrometres). Corneal curvature was measured using the Pentacam HR system (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany). Results Repeat measurements for lower‐order aberrations resulted in larger co‐efficients of repeatability than higher‐order aberrations. Similarly, larger co‐efficients of repeatability between repeated measures across all Zernike co‐efficients were observed in eyes with severe keratoconus (that is, corneal curvature > 52-D) compared to eyes with flatter corneas. The difference between repeated measures tended to be significant for the lower‐order aberrations regardless of corneal curvature. The highest correlations with corneal curvature for right and left eyes respectively, were identified for total higher‐order aberration root mean square (r = 0.92, p < 0.001 and r = 0.91, p < 0.001), followed closely by coma (r = −0.93, p < 0.001 and r = −0.86, p < 0.001) and the Z (3, −1) co‐efficient (r = −0.92, p < 0.001 and r = −0.86, p < 0.001 for right and left eyes, respectively). Conclusions Lower‐order aberrations tended to be less repeatable, indicating that instrument variability must be considered when monitoring progression. Total higher‐order aberration root mean square and third‐order aberrations, in particular the vertical coma Z (3, −1) co‐efficient, demonstrated a stronger correlation with corneal curvature than the lower‐order aberrations.