Clinical utility of family history of depression for prognosis of adolescent depression severity and duration assessed with predictive modeling.

Abstract

BackgroundFamily history of depression (FHD) is a known risk factor for the new onset of depression. However, it is unclear if FHD is clinically useful for prognosis in adolescents with current, ongoing, or past depression. This preregistered study uses a longitudinal, multi‐informant design to examine whether a child’s FHD adds information about future depressive episodes and depression severity applying state‐of‐the‐art predictive out‐of‐sample methodology.MethodsWe examined data in adolescents with current or past depression (age 11–17 years) from the National Institute of Mental Health Characterization and Treatment of Adolescent Depression (CAT‐D) study. We asked whether a history of depression in a first‐degree relative was predictive of depressive episode duration (72 participants) and future depressive symptom severity in probands (129 participants, 1,439 total assessments).ResultsFamily history of depression, while statistically associated with time spent depressed, did not improve predictions of time spent depressed, nor did it improve models of change in depression severity measured by self‐ or parent‐report.ConclusionsFamily history of depression does not improve the prediction of the course of depression in adolescents already diagnosed with depression. The difference between statistical association and predictive models highlights the importance of assessing predictive performance when evaluating questions of clinical utility.