Abstract

ObjectivesConsidering that there is a lack of evidence regarding the contribution of library and information services to evidence-based medicine in actual clinical practice in Japan, the purpose of the study is to explore the current status of use and value of library and information services in clinical settings to examine the usefulness of information in implementing evidence-based medicine (EBM) into practice.MethodsA Web-based survey was conducted at seven sites (hospitals with 300–1,200 beds) and interviews conducted at five sites to investigate information behavior among health professionals (physicians, residents, and nurses) in 2016, replicating the Value Study carried out in the United States in 2010 and 2011. Using a critical incident technique, respondents answered questions about their information topics, information resources used, search location, access points, and evaluation of the information.ResultsAnalysis from 598 valid responses (275 physicians, 55 residents, and 268 nurses) revealed the characteristics of information use and recognition of the value of information. Physicians and residents showed their information needs regarding clinical care using PubMed (80.4%, 65.5%), Ichushi-Web (61.8%, 63.6%), and UpToDate (40.4%, 65.5%). While physicians rely more on electronic journals (37.8%), residents use more hybrid resources including Japanese print books (38.2%) and online books (30.9% for Japanese, 32.7% for English) to confirm their knowledge. Nurses need more information close to patients and explore a wider variety of information resources such as Japanese print books (60.4%), Ichushi -Web (40.3%), Japanese online books (20.5%), and websites of academic organizations (19.0%). Although the overall recognition of the value of information was relatively modest, concrete changes in clinical practice were found in some areas. Environments with insufficient information and availability of electronic resources should be improved to increase the use of library and information services for implementing EBM.

Highlights

  • IntroductionLibrary and information services for health professionals in Japan

  • Library and information services for health professionals in JapanSystematic library and information services for health professionals in Japan are provided mainly by medical and hospital libraries

  • Evidence about how library and information services have contributed to evidence-based medicine (EBM) except in expert searching aimed at developing clinical guidelines is not known, even though Evidence-Based Librarianship (EBL)/ Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) was concurrently proposed for medical and hospital librarians [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Library and information services for health professionals in Japan. Systematic library and information services for health professionals in Japan are provided mainly by medical and hospital libraries. Compared to academic medical libraries, which hold 198,870 volumes, subscribe to 9,271 print and 11,574 electronic journals, and are served by 9.2 staff members on average, hospital libraries are much smaller. An average hospital library has 3,950 books and subscribes to 87 print and 21.5 electronic journals serving users at a hospital with 450 beds with one librarian. Evidence about how library and information services have contributed to EBM except in expert searching aimed at developing clinical guidelines is not known, even though Evidence-Based Librarianship (EBL)/ Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) was concurrently proposed for medical and hospital librarians [5]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call