Abstract

The use of thrombolytic agents in venous thromboembolism has been shown to be highly effective. Patients treated with lytic agents show more rapid clot resolution and lung reperfusion and more rapid and greater reversal of the abnormal hemodynamic responses to pulmonary embolism than patients receiving heparin. Moreover, lytic therapy removes thromboemboli more completely from the pulmonary microcirculation, whereas residual thromboemboli tend to accumulate with heparin therapy. In addition, lytic therapy tends to preserve the venous valves, whereas distortion and destruction occur with heparin therapy. Hence, lytic therapy confers a number of short- and long-term benefits not observed with heparin therapy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.