Abstract
A new systematic review detected strong evidence of unreliable results via use of statistical and logical analyses of 33 randomized clinical trials. Our outrage at these rare occurrences of potential fraud could be rooted in our disdain at our failures in peer review, given that this special effort was required to detect long-running potential fraud.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
